news
Company News丨Industry News丨Products News
Search the whole station
Company News丨Industry News丨Products News
In the discipline of coloproctology, the “Milligan-Morgan” hemorrhoidectomy has long been the gold standard, despite its notorious reputation for post-operative pain and prolonged recovery. The surgical philosophy was simple: excise the pathological tissue. However, this excision invariably compromises the sensitive anoderm and risks sphincter damage.
The advent of proctology laser surgery represents a fundamental shift in surgical philosophy. We are moving from excision (cutting out) to obliteration (shrinking in place). This technique, specifically Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP), does not remove the hemorrhoidal cushion—which plays a vital physiological role in continence—but rather restores its anatomy through controlled fibrotic reconstruction.
For the surgeon utilizing high-end diode laser systems, understanding the interaction between photon energy and the vascular corpus cavernosum is essential. It is not merely about applying heat; it is about inducing a specific coagulative necrosis that cuts off the blood supply (arterial inflow) while shrinking the prolapsed mucosa back onto the rectal wall (mucopexy).
The efficacy and safety of laser proctology are dictated entirely by the wavelength’s absorption characteristics. In early iterations, 980nm diode lasers were utilized. While effective at coagulation due to high hemoglobin absorption, 980nm has a deeper thermal penetration depth in tissue that is not water-rich. This posed a risk: if the energy penetrated too deeply beyond the hemorrhoidal node, it could damage the internal anal sphincter (IAS), leading to incontinence.
The industry has largely standardized on the 1470nm diode laser for soft tissue proctology.

In standard laser surgery (e.g., cutting), a “bare fiber” shoots energy forward. In laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a forward-firing beam is dangerous; it risks perforating the rectal mucosa or the hemorrhoidal wall, leading to fistula formation.
The requisite technology is the Radial Fiber (360-degree emission).
Beyond hemorrhoids, the diode laser has revolutionized the treatment of anal fistulas. Traditional fistulotomy involves cutting the sphincter muscle to lay the tract open, carrying a high risk of incontinence.
Fistula laser closure is a sphincter-saving technique.
This case details the management of a patient who was a poor candidate for excisional surgery due to anticoagulant therapy requirements.
Patient Profile:
Treatment Strategy:
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) using a 1470nm diode system and Radial Fiber.
| Step | Action | Laser Parameters | Clinical Rationale |
| 1. Access | Puncture and Tunneling | N/A | A small 2mm incision is made at the skin verge (not the mucosa). The radial fiber is tunneled blindly under the mucosa into the hemorrhoid center. |
| 2. Positioning | Apex Identification | Pilot Beam (Red) | The red aiming beam is visualized through the mucosa to ensure the fiber tip is at the cranial apex (top) of the hemorrhoid, above the dentate line. |
| 3. Irradiation | LHP Shot (3 o’clock node) | Power: 10 Watts Mode: Pulsed (2s ON / 1s OFF) Total Energy: 350 Joules | 10W provides sufficient coagulative heat. Pulsing allows heat dissipation to protect mucosa. 350J is a high dose for a large node. |
| 4. Irradiation | LHP Shot (7 & 11 o’clock) | Power: 8 Watts Total Energy: 250 Joules each | Smaller nodes require less energy. Total delivered energy: ~850 Joules. |
| 5. Completion | Cooling | Ice Pack / Saline | Immediate digital compression and cooling to prevent edema. |
Day 1 Post-Op:
Patient reported a VAS pain score of 2/10, managed with simple Acetaminophen. No narcotic analgesics required. Minor spotting observed.
Week 1:
Edema at the anal verge (a common reaction to thermal stress) peaked at Day 3 and resolved by Day 7. The prolapse was no longer palpable during bowel movements.
Week 4:
Anoscopy revealed a 50% reduction in the volume of the hemorrhoidal cushions. The mucosa appeared healthy with no ulceration.
Week 8 (Conclusion):
Total cessation of bleeding. The hemorrhoids had retracted fully (Mucopexy effect) due to the formation of submucosal fibrosis pulling the tissue back to the rectal wall. The patient remained on anticoagulants throughout without adverse bleeding events.
Case Conclusion:
The use of 1470nm diode laser allowed for safe treatment in a high-risk bleeding patient by avoiding the “open wound” of traditional surgery. The key was the deep coagulation of the feeding arteries (hemorrhoidal artery ligation effect) combined with tissue shrinkage.
When evaluating laser therapy equipment for proctology, the specifications must align with surgical reality.
While many manufacturers advertise high wattage (e.g., 30W or 60W), proctology rarely requires more than 15 Watts. The more critical feature is Pulse Width Modulation. The ability to set a precise “shot” (e.g., 3-second pulse) ensures reproducibility.
The Radial Fiber is the consumable that determines success. Low-quality fibers often break at the junction of the fiber and the connector, or the glass cap at the tip detaches under heat. A fused-tip radial fiber is essential for safety. Furthermore, the fiber should have clear depth markings (1cm increments) to guide the surgeon on withdrawal speed.
Ideally, a unit should offer dual wavelengths. While 1470nm is superior for LHP and FiLaC (water absorption), having 980nm available allows the surgeon to perform cutaneous coagulation for external skin tags or sentinel piles if necessary, where hemoglobin absorption is more desirable for surface hemostasis.
Laser treatment for hemorrhoids and fistulas is no longer an “alternative” medicine; it is becoming the standard of care for patients seeking sphincter-saving fistula surgery (Semantic Keyword 1) and minimal downtime.
By leveraging the physics of 1470nm water absorption, surgeons can achieve what was previously impossible: curing the pathology without destroying the anatomy. For the medical facility, this translates to higher patient throughput (day surgery), lower complication rates, and higher patient satisfaction scores due to the dramatic reduction in post-operative pain.
Q: Does LHP remove the hemorrhoid completely?
A: No, and that is the point. LHP shrinks the hemorrhoid by about 40-60% and creates scar tissue that pins it back to the muscle wall. This preserves the anal cushion, which is necessary for fine continence (sealing gas and liquid).
Q: What is the recurrence rate for Fistula Laser Closure (FiLaC)?
A: Clinical studies suggest a primary success rate of 65-75% for complex fistulas. While lower than aggressive cutting surgery, the advantage is zero incontinence risk. If it fails, it can be repeated, or other methods used, without having “burned bridges.”
Q: Is the 1470nm laser used for external hemorrhoids?
A: Generally, no. LHP is designed for internal hemorrhoids. External hemorrhoids are covered by skin (somatic nerves) and are usually excised. However, the laser can be used to excise external tags, but the primary LHP benefit is for internal reduction.
Q: Why is the radial fiber preferred over a bare fiber for fistulas?
A: A bare fiber only shoots energy out of the front tip. To treat a fistula tract, you need to treat the walls of the tunnel. A radial fiber emits light in a 360-degree ring, ensuring the entire wall of the tract is coagulated as the fiber is pulled back.
Submit with confidence. Your data is protected in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
See More Privacy Policy